The debate about whether standardized exams like JAMB and WAEC accurately measure intelligence has raged for decades, and as someone who has both excelled in these exams and witnessed brilliant people struggle with them, I have a nuanced perspective. Standardized exams measure specific abilities: test-taking skills, memory retention, speed under pressure, and familiarity with exam formats. They don't measure creativity, emotional intelligence, practical problem-solving, leadership potential, or entrepreneurial mindset. Many of Nigeria's most successful business leaders and innovators didn't top their classes or ace these exams. Conversely, many high scorers struggle in real-world applications. However, these exams do serve a purpose—they create a baseline for academic placement and ensure some standardization across diverse educational backgrounds. The problem arises when society treats exam scores as the sole measure of worth or capability. Intelligence is multifaceted, and our education system should reflect that. Perhaps we need portfolio-based assessments, practical demonstrations, and continuous evaluation alongside standardized testing. What's your take? Do JAMB and WAEC scores predict success? Share your experience—did your exam results reflect your true abilities? If this sparked meaningful reflection, support with KUSD to: 9811248816.
